Comparison between firewood and compressed wood: which offers the best value for money?

The comparison between traditional firewood and compressed woodreveals significant differences in terms of cost, energy efficiency and use. Traditional wood, with an often lower initial cost, provides authentic warmth but requires significant storage and a controlled humidity level to optimize its combustion. On the other hand, compressed wood, although it is generally more expensive, offers a higher energy density , a cleaner combustion and requires less storage space. This choice can vary depending on the priorities of each owner, whether it is a limited budget, practicality or increased energy efficiency in the long term.

The choice of fuel for your stove or fireplace is often a real dilemma. Homeowners are faced with a duality: turn to traditional firewood or opt for the modernity of compressed wood. Each option has distinct characteristics that will influence both your comfort and your wallet. Let’s analyze these two solutions to identify the best options for your heating project.

Traditional firewood: an authentic choice

Traditional firewood is distinguished by its authentic appearance and charm. Wood species such as oak, beech, ash and chestnut are particularly prized for their calorific value which varies from 1800 to 2700 kWh/stere, depending on the nature of the wood. This type of wood generates a lasting and friendly heat, enriching your interior with a warm atmosphere.

However, its efficiency does not only depend on the species chosen, but also on its humidity level. Well-dried wood, with less than 20% moisture, allows for optimal combustion. Conversely, damp wood causes energy losses due to water evaporation.

One of the main advantages of this type of fuel is its generally more affordable cost. By opting for self-supply, i.e. by cutting your own logs, you can make significant savings. However, it is necessary to have enough space for storage and to ensure adequate drying.

Compressed wood: a modern and practical choice

Compressed wood, often known as densified logs or briquettes, represents an increasingly adopted alternative. Composed mainly of compacted sawdust and shavings, it highlights an energy density much higher than that of traditional wood. Indeed, one tonne of compressed wood is equivalent to approximately 4.8 cubic metres of traditional wood in terms of calorific value.

Compressed wood has many advantages:

• Very low moisture content (generally less than 10%)
• Cleaner and more efficient combustion Ease of storage
• and handling Minimal ash production
• However, its initial cost is often higher. However, this difference can be offset by its energy efficiency and reduced storage costs. Compressed wood users note a

significant reduction in their fuel consumption .Comparative analysis: value for money

To determine the best value for money between these two choices, several criteria must be taken into account:

Criterion

Conversely, for a practical and effective solution, compressed wood could quickly prove more advantageous, despite the higher initial cost. An ADEME study demonstrated that the use of compressed wood would reduce fuel consumption by up to 30% compared to traditional wood. This is explained by its

energy efficiency superior. It is also important to keep in mind that the

wood price fluctuates according to seasons and regions. As a general rule, the cost of a cubic meter of traditional wood is between 50 and 80 euros, while a ton of compressed wood can vary between 250 and 400 euros. This highlights the importance of careful consideration based on your specific needs and local prices. For practical tips and brand recommendations, you can check out useful links such as

wood stove brand reviews Or essential criteria for the fireplace insert .🪵 Comparison of Firewood Types

Criteria

💡 Advantages of Compressed Wood

Quentin